OTHERWISE: Oregon Supreme Court Imposes Aggregate Settlement Rule in Clergy Sex Abuse Case //Mass Tort Blog

by Elizabeth Chamblee BurchOn August 21, 2014, the Oregon Supreme Court embraced the ALI’s definition of a non-class aggregate settlement and held that an attorney who represented victims of clergy abuse failed to get the clients’ informed consent before distributing a lump-sum settlement.  In In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Daniel J. Gatti, the court noted that Gatti failed to get clients’ informed consent in writing to the formula or method he devised to divvy up the defendants’ lump-sum settlement payments, which violated Rule 1.8g.  As a result, the court imposed a 90-day suspension as a sanction.For more on the problems associated with lump-sum settlements, see Howie’s article, The Trouble with All-or-Nothing Settlements.

via OTHERWISE: Oregon Supreme Court Imposes Aggregate Settlement Rule in Clergy Sex Abuse Case //Mass Tort Blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s